Archive for the 'recruiting' Category

Feb 19 2010

Grit: Why the best and the Worst REALLY do Matter- In the classrooms for SURE!

This entry has been cross posted to www.leadertalk.org

I just returned from a trip to the U.S. to hire some teachers for my school.  Those trips are grueling, intense and a chance to examine my personal educational beliefs at a core level.

We move out on these trips with great purpose.

We work in teams.

We talk. We collaborate. We commiserate. We come home exhausted.

We interview 15-18 teachers a day and make some very basic decisions (to offer a contract or say “no thank you”) which are VERY important decisions about who will be the teachers in some of our classrooms this next academic year.

Before we went out on our recruiting trips this year, I had our administrative team review an article from Independent School Management titled “Why the Worst (and Best) Teachers Matter”.  Unfortunately it is a copyrighted article not available on the web unless you are member of ISM, but I will quote from the article which focuses the reader on the aphorism that “a rising tide lifts all boats” is not necessarily true day in and day out in the classrooms.  The author notes that “bad” teachers also have an effect on the good teachers in the schools in which we work.  Evidence points to the fact that..

Relationships among people in an organization matter a great deal.

Simply put, students get higher marks when both their teacher and their teacher’s peers are above average; when teachers peers are lower in ability and effectiveness, students achievement levels reflect that.


Technically speaking….

…the study notes that “replacing one peer (teacher) wiht another has one standard deviation higher value-added will increase her students tests scores by 0.86 percent of a standard deviation.” That improvement is noted for reading; for mathematics improvement “is associated with a 3.98% of a standard deviation increase in math test scores.”

Noteworthy?  I think so!  In fact as I read the article, and did as the author suggested and examine this trend in it’s entirety, I believe it confirms just what I believed for some time.  Teachers, like students, benefit from direct learning from their peers, and that learning and professional improvement result from exposure to better peers.  It is probably a “no-duh!” for many administrators out there when I state that it really has nothing to do with the school, and the organization and more about the quality of the teachers in the classrooms.  Great schools, as common sense would tell you, have bad teachers and bad, or poor performing schools have some good teachers.  In the Atlantic Monthly article “What Makes are Great Teacher?” author Amanda Ripley notes in her article detailing the “New Teacher Project” that,

For years, the secrets to great teaching have seemed more like alchemy than science, a mix of motivational mumbo jumbo and misty-eyed tales of inspiration and dedication.

She goes on to share that…

But we have never identified excellent teachers in any reliable, objective way. Instead, we tend to ascribe their gifts to some mystical quality that we can recognize and revere—but not replicate. The great teacher serves as a hero but never, ironically, as a lesson.


Noting that…

Parents have always worried about where to send their children to school; but the school, statistically speaking, does not matter as much as which adult stands in front of their children. Teacher quality tends to vary more within schools—even supposedly good schools—than among schools.


So, what should we be looking for out there?  What kinds of traits do we look for, and HOW does my team of administrators gleen realization of these traits from brief 15-30 minute interviews. My take as always been to find learners, not learned teachers.  I have always looked for teachers who have an innate joy and love of life.  I look for teachers who have demonstrated leadership and goal aquisition in the past.  I look for teachers who have perserverved, not through hardship, but toward a single-minded high standard for the student learning experience.  My common sense is once again confirmed as noted by Ripley when she quotes the Journal of Positive Psychology.

In a study published in The Journal of Positive Psychology in November 2009, they evaluated 390 Teach for America instructors before and after a year of teaching. Those who initially scored high for “grit”—defined as perseverance and a passion for long-term goals, and measured using a short multiple-choice test—were 31 percent more likely than their less gritty peers to spur academic growth in their students. Gritty people, the theory goes, work harder and stay committed to their goals longer. (Grit also predicts retention of cadets at West Point, Duckworth has found.)

Interestingly this hit a nerve with me.  It makes a lot of common sense.

Grit.  Stamina. A learner. Flexible. Adaptable. Grit.


Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Photo courtesy of http://www.flickr.com/photos/68898571@N00/3562074395

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

7 responses so far

Oct 25 2009

Lost Sleep in Search of a Big Picture

I had a nice compliment this week from visiting consultants we had at school. In our debrief with them at the end of an intense week of embedded PD, they noted to me that they liked working at my school because I keep my job focused on the big picture. Hmm… I thought… the “big picture”.   What exactly does that mean?

After it is all said and done, my search for the view from 35000 feet continues to keep me up at night. I wake up suddenly with a start and realize that we had not thought of this or that, and I really need to hone in on that idea further.  One of those is the role of libraries in our effort to provide a balanced digital and print environment to our students.  Yes… that’s right.. BALANCED!  Seeing as how the idea of balance needs to be defined, I was glad to see that one of my favorite blogger authors Doug Johnson (note:this site is blocked in China) has co-authored an article with Joyce Kasman Valenza in the School Library Journal titled “Things That Keep Us Up at Night”. (SLJ, 10/1/09) The article is targeted at librarians, but really has hit home with our administrative team at my school this week as well.  They write…

The future of the school library as a relevant and viable institution is largely dependent on us and how quickly we respond to change.


Libraries are no different than the classroom environment in many ways. The library, like the classroom is beginning to face an identity crisis of sorts.  The role of the learning space is being stretched by always available, always accessible and always relevant resources at the fingertips of the students.  The people who run libraries and classrooms are facing a sea of changing faces, with our students being completely at home in the digital environment and engaged in what seems like so many, many things simultaneously. Some of it good, and some of it bad and some of it useless and some it needing the guiding hand of a

trained professional educator, while other parts of it can be easily mined, harvested and mashed-up and republished.  Johnson and Kasman Valenza note that the challenge of keeping up with these trends will keep us all busy. Again, speaking to librarians they state,

Look around your state conferences. How many of your colleagues graduated from library school more than 20 years ago? Remember what the landscape looked like in 1989? How do we stay one step ahead of our staff and students in information accessing, evaluation, use, and communication in order to be seen as experts and collaborators? Do we know more about current information strategies than our school’s technology coach? No excuses. We must! If we are truly information professionals, we need not only to keep up, but also be on the cutting edge of changes in the search and information landscapes.

Libraries almost invariably contain long aisle...
Image via Wikipedia

My favorite part of the article though speaks to “Advocacy by nonlibrarians”.  Here they write:

Rather than creating a perfect library, we need to reshape our thinking and create the perfect library for our individual institution. We can do this by changing our mind-set from adopting best practices as defined by our own professional organization to adopting a “customer service/support” orientation by crafting goals that support the larger goals of the organization.


Should this not hold true for all parts of our schools?  The best part of this though is that this is librarians thinking about and discussing their craft knowledge and reapplying it to a potentially new setting with a focus on the goals of the larger organization.  This is big picture thinking in action!  No wonder they can’t sleep. This is exciting stuff!

The authors write at the end of their article a bit of a call to action for libraries and librarians.  The word apathy certainly is written here, but I that the gist of the message is that without urgent action educational change, technological change and the variety of political forces in schools will define the role of the library for us.  I agree with the authors when they state their clear warning that:

Our best librarians will evolve, adapt, and thrive in effective
schools. But will they be called librarians? And will they be in
sufficient numbers for the profession as a whole to survive?

From 35000 feet I know that some things will be changing soon.

—————————————————-

Flickrstorm Photo Tagged “38800 FT” on : http://www.flickr.com/photos/20420218@N04/3903688501

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

4 responses so far

Mar 31 2009

Great Blogs for Busy Admin…. a lot to learn here!

www.schooltechleadership.org

Scott McLeod has pulled together a nice list of some of the more innovative blogs written as a resource for busy admin. He has provided you with a recommended list of blogs for busy administrators (and educational leadership faculty). You can subscribe to them individually by clicking on the relevant link or you can read/subscribe to all of them at once by using one of these links:

It is worth a look!

Andy

,

Powered by ScribeFire.

Enhanced by Zemanta

No responses yet

Feb 27 2009

Using Video???

I just read this on Leadertalk:

Using Flip Camera for Teacher Evaluations

The Flip
camera seems to be just about everywhere these days. The Flip makes it very easy to record and share video with other users, a fact which has not been overlooked by our hardworking teachers in the field. But, I feel that we should not overlook the potential of the flip in helping leaders help make us better teachers. Having conducted many an observation, and having many more conducted upon me, I know how difficult it is to visualize where my teaching could improve. The Fliphas the potential to make to make visualizations unecessary. The video does not lie, and at almost no effort to the administrator or the teacher involved in the process, a lesson could be recorded and jointly reviewed either in person or online. I have been using the Flip for some time to provide videos of my lectures to students who missed one of my college courses when it first occurred to me that the Flip has the potential to revolutionize evaluations and shadowing as we currently do them. Obviously, there has been the technology to do this for some time, but the equipment and methods were often bulky and complex. The Flip makes the process as simple as click, record, upload, and view. I have no doubt that this ability will revolutionize the way we do observations. I also have little doubt that its use will be subject of much ethics debate, however I am hopeful that the little camera that can will help us become better teachers if our leaders will use it properly.

Regards,

Jason Hancock

www.drhancock.net


Hmm…. interesting idea. It connects me with a personal experience…..

When I was teaching, one my supervisors demanded we video tape one lesson, watch it and write a reflection. I don’t remember what the lesson was I taught nor the outcome, but I do remember hearing her cackle with glee in reading my reflection which started out….

“I was struck by what I saw.  An extremely handsome teacher who obviously should be walking the catwalks of Paris and New York rather than teaching 4th grade in Beaverton, Oregon.”


I am not sure what she found amusing about that.

Flip camera image via flickrstorm @ http://static.flickr.com/2099/2437471860_8f6cc8e28c.jpg

,

Powered by ScribeFire.

Enhanced by Zemanta

2 responses so far

Feb 22 2009

Another thought about “Thought Leadership”

Title page to Locke's Some Thoughts Concerning...

Image via Wikipedia

I wrote on Friday for Leadertalk and here about my experiences with Thought Leadership and My Personal Professional Development.  I have received some great comments, one of which I followed the link to this gentleman’s blogDon Cowert notes at the top of his blogspot blog that,

I have been in Elementary Education for over ten years. In that time I have been a teacher of many grades and a Principal of Daniel D. Waterman Elementary School and Hope Highlands Elementary in Cranston, Rhode Island. In these 10+ years I have had thousands of conversations with teachers and parents about children and how they learn. I feel like I have helped a lot of people in this short time period. I decided to create this Blog as a forum for these kinds of conversations.

I want to draw your attention to Don’s post on “How We Learn- William Glasser”. His posting about his thoughts and experiences opens the door for some wonderful dialouge on an important educational leadership issue in our schools. His post begins with Glasser’s percentage listing on how we learn-

How We Learn
10% of what we READ
20% of what we HEAR
30% of what we SEE
50% of what we SEE and HEAR
70% of what is DISCUSSED with OTHERS
80% of what is EXPERIENCED PERSONALLY
95% of what we TEACH TO SOMEONE ELSE
~William Glasser – http://principalcowart.blogspot.com

I encourage you to give Don’s blog a read and have it join your list of educational leaders blogs you might be reading.

Enhanced by Zemanta

2 responses so far

Feb 06 2009

I think we need to think ahead- 22nd Century Skills

I was always told that it was unsafe to be facicious when writing.  Many people don’t get the subtly of the written language, and one might be accused of being a bit… well…. rude, or cruel, or STUPID…. or any other of the many derogatory names that are used in blogs today.  So, when I started reading the article “When “21st-Century Schooling” Just Isn’t Good Enough:  A Modest Proposal” by Alfie Kohn, I had to laugh, giggle and then it made me think. I immediately thought about my colleague and friend Jeff Utecht who states, adamantly, that the 21st Century is 9 years old. When are we going to start teaching the skills necessary be successful in it! 

I have always admired Dr. Kohn. He knows his stuff. He communicates in strong, consistent and understandable terms.  He has a strong sense of humor, and this article is buried in irony, sarcasm and thought-provoking imagery. 

At the end of the article- the last paragraph- which is also published in the February 2009 issue of District Administration he states:

One last point.  We will of course continue to talk
earnestly about the need for a curriculum that features “critical thinking” skills
– by which we mean the specific proficiencies acceptable to CEOs.  But you
will appreciate the need to delicately discourage real critical
thinking on the part of students, since this might lead them to pose inconvenient
questions about the entire enterprise and the ideology on which it’s based.  There’s
certainly no room for that in the global competitive economy of the
future.  Or the present.

The question of the day: Does the readers of District Administration have the critical thinking skills to figure out that he’s trying to make a point?

A specimen sheet of typefaces and languages, b...
Image via Wikipedia
Enhanced by Zemanta

No responses yet

Dec 13 2008

Interview Questions for Schools going 1:1- A Collaborative Project

Published by Andrew under 1:1,recruiting

My colleague and friend at International School of Bangkok, Mr. Jeff Utecht, invited me to collaborate on a list of interview questions that administrators might consider asking teaching candidates as they move to job fairs.  My school, like many in Asia and the world are planning the big move to 1:1 computing and beyond the preparations for the teachers we have on contract using an aggressive staff development model, we also must have strong new teachers to come on board and make it happen as well.

Jeff came to me last year with a list of questions which I thought were well thought out. I’ve written about the international school recruiting experience in the past. So it seems fitting that I post these questions that Jeff and I worked up (more him than me!) via a google doc.

So… here are the questions. I have attached the PDF for downloading below.

Questions for teachers entering a 1:1 school

What computer platform are you most comfortable with, Mac, PC or Tablet?
I think this is an important question as schools become focused on a platform. It’s not an indication of whether or not you are going to hire the person, but their answer to this question based on what your school is (Mac, PC, or Tablet) might lead you to ask other questions about their computer use. If they are most comfortable with a Mac for example you might ask them how they would feel working in a PC school? At this point in time I think it’s a question that you have to get on the table early so you each know where the other is coming from.

Why do you want to work in a 1:1 school?
In my opinion the answer to this question is crucial! I’m looking for excitement in their response. I’m looking for them to be excited at the opportunity that they get to teach in a 1:1 school. I think the answers are going to be all over the board, but are they excited? At some point hopefully they talk about enhancing student learning.

What particular challenges and learning opportunities excite you about working in a 1:1 school like ours?
Can the candidate articulate why they are excited to work at your school? Why do they see 1:1 schools as being exciting places to work. I would be looking for an answer that talks about changing the classroom environment. Changing the way teaching happens and the way learners learn. I want to hear about the opportunities that the candidate sees for their classroom and their subject area.

Being able to look up information and resources on the web is an important skill. Explain how you go about looking up information on the web. How do you verify that the information you found is trustworthy and of use to you and your students?
This question is asked to see if candidates understand the importance of verifying information found on the Internet. Do they understand .edu sites? Do they know how to check a WHOIS? Listen to their response and see if they can tell you how they verify information on the web and do they sound confident enough that they could teach this to students in their class?

Knowing we are a 1:1 school and that we expect students to use their laptops for learning. What is something that you would start learning and thinking about today to prepare you for this new learning environment?

I want to know they are thinking about the change that happens to the classroom when you introduce a computer to every child. Are they thinking about classroom management, are they thinking about online resources, are they thinking about how their class can be student-centered, how when you put this tool in the hands of students that you no longer control the content in your classroom and you, the teacher have just become a facilitator of learning. I want to know they are thinking about the changes that happen to learning. If they say that teaching is teaching, I’d be worried.

At what times do you feel that it would be appropriate to have “lids down”?  When do you believe a laptop is not a tool for appropriate use?
I think this would be telling. Many teachers stuck in the lecture/listen mode would tell you that when they want kids to “listen” or “work with others” an interviewer would have to pry.  Those of us who have used the tool as collaborative note taker (think live blogging  or back channel notes here!) know the power of this, but a traditional teacher may struggle with the giving away the power of the tools to the kids.

How comfortable are you with using online resources in your classroom? What are some resources you have used in the past? How have your found these resources?
Hopefully your candidate has used online resources in their class before and they can articulate what and how they use those resources. I would continue on this question asking probing questions that lead me to the next question on this list. Do they use Wikipedia? How do they use it? Do they only name online databases or paid sites? In part you might be able to learn about their ability to search and find information on the Internet through the answers to this question.

Tell me how you think the future you are preparing children for will be different?
I’d love to hear the answers to this one. Of course as an administrator, you too better understand the new connected digital world we are preparing students for.

How often do you/have you taken part in technology Professional Development opportunities?
We know that constant professional development in the use of technology is needed. Both before and during the implementation of a 1:1 program. I want to know that the teacher candidate has continued to seek out and find ways to learn about technology. If it has been years since they have been to any technology PD courses/conferences/sessions, then this is an indication that they will need some support.

On the other hand hopefully they answer with something like “I take part in Professional Development opportunities every day.” This response would definitely be a notch up for an applicant. It would tell me two things. 1. That the teacher candidate is and believes in being a lifelong learner. 2. That they understand how to learn and take opportunities everyday to learn by connecting themselves into a network of professionals either locally or virtually.

Do you read any professional magazines or educational blogs as part of your own PD? If so, which ones?
With this question you are trying to find out if the candidate is comfortable with reading online resources. I believe this question also is a good lead question into the other questions below as they give the candidate a heads up that you are looking for a teacher that really understands how a 1:1 classroom is different, and that you expect your teachers do be reading online, researching online, and using the Internet as a resource in their classroom.

Do you have an RSS reader? If so, what do you subscribe to?
This is a huge hiring point for me. If candidates say they have an RSS reader and they understand what RSS is and what it means to “subscribe” to something, then they are on their way to understanding how teaching and learning changes in a networked digital environment. It also indicates a lifelong learner who has some understanding of how the web is changing.

Do you belong to any online communities?
What communities does the teacher belong to? Twitter? Any educational Ning sites? A Google or Yahoo group maybe? If a teacher answers he/she belongs to an educational community, then you have a lifelong learner on your hands who is open to learning and thinking in new ways.

Do you have a Personal Learning Network? If so, can you tell me a story of how you learn from your network.
Now you’re starting to separate the wheat from the chaff. If you can find a teacher that A. Knows what a PLN is and B. Can tell you a story of how they learn, you are looking at a teacher who might not know the platform that your 1:1 program is, but knows they have people that can help them learn it. A teacher that knows how to use a Personal Learning Network (PLN) is a teacher that will need little “official” professional development as they will be learning on their own, and most likely will be a leader in your school in helping others to learn.

How often do others come to you for guidance in using technology? Do you offer guidance when not asked? If so, describe how you did this recently?
Is this teacher viewed as a technology leader by others? Chances are you already knew that based on questions above. In a 1:1 teaching environment you can never have to many technology and learning experts in your grasp.

PDF: Interview Questions for 1:1 Schools w/answers

PDF: Interview Questions for 1:1 Schools w/o answers

photo courtesy of creative commons http://static.flickr.com/3179/2887167256_9bcb0f2c40.jpg

Technorati Tags: , ,

One response so far

Nov 27 2008

Still getting comments from my first post- A response to a comment

“Randy”- left an anonymous comment to “First Posting… Recruiting on the Road”:

Why so much emphasis on technology? Focus on teachers who remember how to function without the latest gadgets, especially when the power goes off. I’m personally saddened when I see kids unable to walk without a wire in their ear or with “text-messaging” addictions. Maybe the focus on technology is one of the reasons education is failing. I was shocked one year when my university added remedial courses in order to bring the high school students up to par.

I don’t want a kid who has the latest gadgets. I want one who can figure out that half of eight is “0″ or “3″ or “6″ or “2.” Or if I ask a group of kids how many bricks it takes to finish a job, hopefully some will know the answer is “one” and not run off to actually count the bricks.

And I would hope your reply to me is not “well, that’s the way the world is.”

My response:

Randy, you missed the point.  The point of the questions is to focus on whether this person is a risk-taker and learner.  These 5 questions are not about yes or no. They are about conversation, collaboration, risk-taking, learning.  A favorite gadget could be a paint brush or a personal organization tool.  We need flexible, adaptable, creative and open-minded teachers.

What is the way of the world, Randy, is that we as schools have high expectations from our clients (parents and students) to provide quality content embedded in useful, widely applicable skills (including the use of modern technology) which will be used in higher education and the workplace.To ignore these tools (which sadly many do) could be considered educational malpractice.  I am not of a mind-set that people either DO use technology tools or DON’T use technology tools, but…. I have plenty of evidence building that is beginning to turn my opinion.  As you are probably aware, an interview is an opportunity for the employer to set the stage for expectations. In our school, the use of appropriate, powerful, technology tools is an expectation, and is often one that is ignored in the interview setting.

I could respond to your comment about your university having to bring the high school students up to par.” I won’t here, but I suspect there may be about 500 educational bloggers out there who would love to have a shot at that remark.

Randy, I don’t know who you are as you did not leave a last name or a web-address, but I suspect you found the posting from a website that discusses international schools (I have been getting a lot of links from that site lately).  I generally would not approve anonymous comments, but I thought this comment was worth further response.  I would encourage you to come out from under the shade and participate openly in the conversations on the web. It will bring you great connections and build your personal professional learning network. Think about it.  You might also want to connect to David Warlick’s blog post on How to Hire Tech Savvy Teachers.

If you are looking for a job I wish you good luck.  It is this sort of passion and common sense you have tried to address in your comment that good schools are looking for out there, as long as it is approached with professionalism and an open-mind.

Photo courtesy of CC http://www.flickr.com/photos/8168864@N06/499525700

Technorati Tags: , ,

No responses yet

Nov 24 2008

Just Giving a Test and Teaching the Content = “Just doing my Job”

I’ve heard it three times in the last week.

“I have to teach the content.”

Is it just me, or is this the same as saying “I’m just doing my job”?

Do we work in a factory?  Do we have widgets to produce or are we building learners here?

Seth Godin wrote a bit of a rant last week in his post “Just doing my Job“.   I want to print it off and share it with a few people. Seth states….

If you take a job, you’ve bought into what the company does. You’re responsible.

If you work for a company headed off a cliff, hey, you’re going too. The fact that you’re just doing your job doesn’t make unemployment any better. And if the company is hurting people or the world you operate in, it doesn’t matter who told you to do it, you still did it.

I suppose that this road runs both ways though…. if you take a job you’ve bought into what the company does, BUT common sense would also say that a company that puts up with a member of the organization that is doing something that is counterproductive to the mission and vision of the organization then does it not send the message that it is really not committed either? Are the supervisors and evaluators just as responsible for the mediocrity?

Food for thought.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Photo CC- http://static.flickr.com/42/107810103_f9f12699d6.jpg

2 responses so far

Nov 20 2008

Applying the 90/10 Marketing Rule to International School Recruiting

Published by Andrew under recruiting

I have in past years written posts to my blog about recruiting teachers to international schools.  I have even made a point of posting some of my interview questions to see 1) if potential candidates are reading up on our school and 2) to get the conversation started in a short period of time focusing on the use of the web in teaching and learning.  I have to report here that there has been significant success on both fronts and the teachers who check my blog out do seem to have some tech skills to bring to the classroom setting.  Hint: If you are looking for a job at my school, you might want to do your homework!

One of my colleagues wrote to me yesterday pointing out a post by Seth Godin which outlines the 90/10 rule of marketing.

Seth states:

Most hiring managers don’t understand organizations that go to
extraordinary lengths to find and retain amazing people. And from their
point of view, they’re completely correct. Pay market wage, run a
classified, process the resumes. Done.

It only takes 10% as much effort to hire someone in the bottom 90% of the class.

And it takes the other 90% to find and cajole and retain the top 10%.

This year, it is not hiring that is on our minds in the international setting, it is in retaining these talented people we have had to fight tooth and nail to hire in past years.  The cycle often is that after about four years in an international school, the teacher or administrator starts to get antsy and has their eye on the next horizon.  Not because they are unhappy, but because they are part of the international school culture adventure, exploration and in search of personal expansion and improvement.

Our deeper dilemma is that our school community demands the very best, the most experienced, top level educators.  If you get hired at our school, we expect you to deliver a high quality product (instructional program).

Again, Seth Godin:

If your organization can thrive with ordinary folks, then the
marketing you’re doing right now to fill the ranks might even be
overkill. You’ve got plenty of resumes. No need to pretend you’re doing
anything much more than bottom fishing, though. That plaque for
employee of the month? You can sell it on eBay.

On the other hand, organizations that work best with extraordinary
talent are almost certainly not investing enough in finding and
developing it. If marketing works so well that you spend a fortune on
it, why aren’t you marketing your jobs? If talent is so important that
you are betting the company on it, why aren’t you actually investing in
finding and retaining that talent?

As school leaders, we should note this “rule” as we continue our search for new teachers, but we should also market our school to our current employees as well.

Ask ourselves… Do they feel valued? Can they see progress toward the vision of the organization? Do they know what the role is in the wider scope of the school?  Do they feel empowered or simply a pawn in the organization?

How is your school using their resources to hire and RETAIN the best teachers in a competitive market place?

This entry has been cross posted to the www.leadertalk.org blog

Image from Creative Commons http://static.flickr.com/13/19731692_2460d6fda1.jpg

Technorati Tags: , ,

No responses yet

Next »

  •  

    September 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « May    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    27282930  
  • Subscribe
  • Add to Technorati Favorites
  • My Clustr Map

  • Where I have been and Where I will be

    earcosI ATI EOU pacific Lewis and Clark Apple Conference
    Wikispaces
  • Get your own free Blogoversary button!
  • Archives

  • Meta

  • Creative Commons License
    Sentiments On Common Sense Blog by Andrew Torris is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.