I have written before about my belief that staff development needs to be addressed as a long term effort, and not something that can be taken on as a short term effort to solve a particular problem.
Let’s face facts! Common Sense tells us that to really learn to do something well, guided practice with a trained expert will result in success far more times than a single “sit and get” lecture of a visit to our local or regional conference. It is how our BRAINS work!
Sure, there are exceptions out there, but teachers who do apply knowledge garnered at a single sit down session are either 1) unusual, 2) probably educational risk takers or 3) a little bit nuts. Perhaps some of us are a combo of the three, but I won’t write about that today!

Today when I opened my email, I found the digital version of ISTE’s Learning and Leading magazine. In it is an article called “Getting to the Heart of Technology Integration and focuses on the Instructional Technology Resource Teacher Program in the State of Virginia. The article is written by Teresa Coffman, associate professor at the University of Mary Washington. From what I read of Professor Coffman’s writings, these folks are close to getting it right. The State Department of Education in Virginia mandates that the 134 school districts in the state employ tech teams built around two key positions.
Those positions are:
- An ITRT, who is responsible for training teachers to use technoloyg and software effectively, as well as helping teachers integrate that technology into their curricula.
- A technology support staff persons who is responsible for managing the school’s information network.
From what I read, in the Virginia model the program relies on the collaboration of the classroom teacher and the ITRT. Wow! The state is mandating that the ITRT and the classroom teachers communicate and strategize the implementation of the technology tools and provide direct support in the classroom environment.
The ITRT staffer has a wide vareity of responsibilities, but some include:
- Modeling instructional strategies for teachers
- Providing direct training and professional development
- Researching technology-based instructional strategies
- Evaluating software and hardware
- Meeting with administrators and content supervisors at the school or district level to coordinate services
- Serve on building and district leadership teams
- Creating and implementing a plan for communication on progress and activities to school faculty and admininstration.
- Maintaining records where and when appropriate to document progress
So… What’s Missing?
Where is the administrator support? Why is it that the administrators are left off the list? Why does the state not recognize the importance of administrative leadership in the implementation of technology. Nothing will do more to raise the bar at a school level than to hold the administrators responsible for (at the minimum) the NETS-A. To be fair accountability applied to any member of our learning communities without support of those members, is like taxation without representation.
Let’s just simply add one bullet point:
- Provide direct training, support and professional development to building and district level administration on the building of their digital leadership skills which focuses on the use of technology tools for administrative work and on the evaluation of the use of technology in the classroom programs.
I think that without that step, the $500 million dollars dedicated to this effort will fall well short of the effectiveness that the designers have hoped for in the long term. The implementation of this program is merely focused on and dependent upon the ITRT position. The good news here is that Virginia has at least recognized this as a key component.
The article states that:
Of the recommendations that researchers made for the ITRT program’s continued success, perhaps the most compelling was the idea that administrators should become more involved in the program so that they can recognize effective technology use and support their teachers’ integration efforts.
The author goes on to state that:
A Technology Resource Teacher Coaching Academy…. echoed this sentiment. It found variable levels of administrative involvement in the county. Some ITRTs indicated that their administrators provide ample support adn encouragement, and this was both necessary and beneficial.
Necessary and beneficial- yes, I could not agree more. It is in many ways like the air we breath. It is not only necessary but also beneficial. Without administrative support, technology integration efforts, no matter how well financed and resourced will struggle and suffer.
An analysis of the program (written in 2007) can be found at this link: http://www.doe.virginia.gov/VDOE/Technology/OET/info_brief_itrt.pdf
Related articles by Zemanta:
Leading and Learning, ISTE, ITRT, Technology Integration Specialists, Administration, Digital Leadership
Powered by ScribeFire.