Tag Archive '1:1'

Apr 10 2010

1:1- Resources, Teachers, Committed Leaders, Student Centered Approaches and PD!- It is Common Sense!

Arnold Schwarzenegger speaking at the lighting...

Image via Wikipedia

I don’t often get a chance to quote Arnold Schwarzenegger but I will today. This from an edweek.org article:

“How can kids compete in the global economy when the information the schools feed them is stale and is outdated and is old?

Then, while minding my own business at home on a lovely Saturday in Shanghai, one of the teachers at our school sent me this link to an article stating that 1:1 programs are only as good as their teachers. The article titled, “One to One computing programs only as effective as their teacher” by Meris Stansbury states that:

Not surprisingly, the researchers say the most important factor of all is the teaching practices of instructors—suggesting school laptop programs are only as effective as the teachers who apply them.

Let’s apply some common sense here:

1.  Students need up to date resources.  Not “stale” or “outdated” ones.
2.  Students need effective teachers with effective teaching practices.

A teacher writing on a blackboard.

Image via Wikipedia

Again, not surprisingly The authors of the Texas study conclude:

“Respondents at higher implementing schools reported that committed leaders, thorough planning, teacher buy-in, preliminary professional development for teachers, and a commitment to the transformation of student learning were keys to their successful implementation” of the state’s Technology Immersion Project.

Let’s add another layer of common sense:

1.  Students need up to date resources.  Not “stale” or “outdated” ones.
2.  Students need effective teachers with effective teaching practices.
3. COMMITTED LEADERS!

Another educator listed in the same article states:

“In our 1-to-1 program … we put a big emphasis on project-based learning; otherwise, the laptop is no more than an expensive notepad. … Research needs to show the effects of this different style of teaching in terms of student engagement, motivation, and so-called 21st-century skills. The subject matters themselves don’t have as much room for improvement,”

Ok…once again,some common sense here:

1.  Students need up to date resources.  Not “stale” or “outdated” ones.
2.  Students need effective teachers with effective teaching practices.
3. COMMITTED LEADERS!
4.  STUDENT CENTERED learning approaches.

Then they state in the article:

Given the importance of teachers in the success of school laptop initiatives, it’s no surprise that “teacher preparation through [ongoing professional development] was important for successful implementation,” write Bebell and O’Dwyer. “As 1-to-1 programs become more popular, the quality and depth of preparation that teachers receive for implementation will become a central predictor of program success.”

They go on to say:

“Buying laptops is the easiest part of the process, but too often school districts neglect such fundamental items as providing initial and ongoing professional development for the teachers and providing sufficient tech support,” Thompson said. “Taking a true TCO [total cost of ownership] approach would avoid many of the mistakes, as schools often do not have a good grasp of the real costs of starting and continuing a 1-to-1 program. And part of the TCO approach should be setting measurable program objectives and then doing formative and summative program evaluations, whose results are made known to everyone to provide a feedback loop in the continuous planning and re-planning that characterizes successful programs.”

I probably will have to stop here but… some more common sense:

1.  Students need up to date resources.  Not “stale” or “outdated” ones.
2.  Students need effective teachers with effective teaching practices.
3. COMMITTED LEADERS!
4.  STUDENT CENTERED learning approaches.
5. ONGOING Professional Development!

Schools moving to a 1:1 program needs to read this article. It is a great summary of issues. I believe I have only scratched the surface.

In closing, I draw your attention to a quote from Tammy Stephens, CEO of the Stephens Group LLC, a private investment firm, is working on a dissertation that focuses on the evolution of transformational communication patterns in 1-to-1 computing environments. She has been evaluating a 1-to-1 program in the Milwaukee Public Schools for the past three years.

According to Stephens, changing teaching practices to incorporate 21st-century skills with laptops “is definitely an evolution, and it takes time for teacher practices to evolve.”

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

No responses yet

Sep 18 2008

Mobile Digtal Ubiquitious

Published by Andrew under Uncategorized

Learning 2.008 Shanghai Conference

A presentation by Julie Lindsey

Julies has provided a picture of a variety of mobile devices used in her school. She is providing a learning environment where cell phones, iPhones, Asus computers and other laptops.

Issues around the following:
- Standardization- Blended platform— three types of machines.  We should all look carefully.. very carefully at the infrastructure.  On-site support is important. Wikis are a widely used tool- focus on the learning– not on the tech.  Bringing information fluency and Digital Literacy.  Building a student and educator PLN (personal learning network) Good use of formative assessment examples here: http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/assess/index.asp

- Convergance- What is the laptop for in a classroom?  Communicating, creating, collaborating.  Actual, real world activities. Approaching it from a Web 2.0 .  http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/ good resource.  But why should we rethink our practice?  We are getting “good result”.  We are looking for ways to construct knowledge.

Suggestions:

1- Every student should have a blog?
2. Every teacher shoudl have a blog?
3. Every administrator should have a blog?
4. Encourage sustained conversation through expectation?

Wikis— digital collaboration tool
Horizon Project Wiki
Digital portfolios with accompanying student-led conferencing

- Affordability-  Web 2.0 – “practically” free.

- Adaptability

- Acceptable Use- AUP’s for purpose- one for blogs, one for wikis

Resouces from the back channel:

Ewan: Essential reading on the role of the learning (b)log: http://ngfl.northumberland.gov.uk/keystage3ictstrategy/Assessment/blackbox.pdf

Ewan: http://edubuzz.org/support – our effort at an AUP that covers it all, from two years ago. Not perfect, but not bad, either. It was co-written between lawyers, parents etc.. See my talk tomorrow for more

Julie is also selling some http://flatclassroomconference.com

Technorati Tags: , , ,

No responses yet

Sep 18 2008

1:1- An Unconference reflection

Published by Andrew under 1:1

Sitting in an unconference session here in Shanghai discussion about 1:1. 

A gentleman in the back of the room just went on a “rail” against 1:1 classroom.  He is stating that there is no real reason for 1:1 programs, there are no test score returns on 1:1 programs… etc, etc?

So.. we all ask- Why are we really doing 1:1?

Let’s start a list, and I will begin to formulate references for the major points.

1.  Transforming the learning environment
2.  Extends and expands the learning setting for students
3.  Brings to the fingertips the resources of the internet that would not be accessible in the “guided” learning setting
4.  Develops the skills of collaboration that will serve the student through the life
5.  Engages families more readily in the educational process using the same collaboration tools.

More later…..

One response so far